Fiona Crawley vs Sumvruta Iyengar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Iyengar has struggled with their second serve, failing to win any points in recent matches, whereas Crawley's second serve has yielded a success rate of 37.83%.
• When it comes to returning, Iyengar has not been able to win any points on their opponent’s second serves, while Crawley has performed significantly better with a 55% success rate.
• In-stats reflect that Crawley has secured breakpoints at a rate of 47.85%, an area where Iyengar has shown no success recently, having saved none.
• Over the past year, Crawley's match win rate stands at 54.29%, much higher compared to Iyengar's 20%.
• As for surface preference, Crawley's best results are on hard courts, with a strong 71% win rate, while Iyengar’s preference seems unfavorable on any surface, struggling particularly on clay with a mere 7% win rate.
• Crawley's matches have mainly been in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 44.44% win rate, illustrating better performance than Iyengar's 25% in similar events.
• Despite Iyengar facing higher-ranked opponents, they haven't converted this experience into wins, unlike Crawley who has played against lower-ranked, but triumphed more frequently.
• In deciding sets, Crawley maintains a 43% win rate, contrasting sharply with Iyengar's unyielding outcomes in this scenario.
• Crawley has demonstrated a higher success rate of 42.75% when converting breakpoints, a strong offensive measure compared to Iyengar’s inefficacy in the same category.
• With these stats in mind, would it be correct to assume that Crawley's consistent performance gives them the edge in upcoming matches? The numbers suggest so, given the difference in outcomes.

Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):

As we evaluate the comparative strengths and weaknesses of both players, the statistical disparity becomes quite evident. Iyengar has notably struggled across various performance metrics, particularly in serving and breaking points, where they have consistently underperformed.

On the other hand, Crawley exhibits superior proficiency in critical areas such as second serve consistency and breakpoint conversion. Their ability to capitalize on return games and manage high-pressure scenarios has been demonstrably better, suggesting a strong competitive edge over Iyengar.

Furthermore, Crawley's adeptness on hard courts and their successful track record in deciding sets reaffirm their advantage going into this match. Given these analytical insights, Crawley appears to be the more likely victor in this meeting.